Clarence Thomas downplayed the 1/6 insurrection during discussions with SCOTUS

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, whose wife was implicated in Trump’s plot to overturn 2020, downplayed the 1/6 insurrection during SCOTUS arguments.

The Supreme Court was hearing arguments related to federal obstruction of justice law used to charge 350 Trump insurrectionists.

Justice Clarence Thomas went further and downplayed the insurrection:

Judge Thomas should not be taking this case. He should be recused because he has a clear conflict of interest. Judge Thomas’ wife, Ginni, was implicated in the plot to overturn the election. Ginni Thomas pressured election officials in states like Arizona to overturn the results.

Every time Clarence Thomas violates basic ethical standards, the Supreme Court’s credibility crisis grows.

A special message from PoliticusUSA

If you are in a position to donate exclusively to help us keep the doors open on PoliticusUSA during what is a critical election year, please do so here.

We are honored to have been able to put your interests first for 14 years as we respond only to our readers and will not compromise on that core, core value of PoliticusUSA.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *