The American electorate is at a crossroads as the calendar turns to November 5, 2024. The choice before them is between two septuagenarians: a fiery 78-year-old and a more subdued 81-year-old, both vying for the mantle of leader of the free world. The decision, however, goes beyond the personalities of the candidates. It is also a referendum on the economic policies they support. With the national debt at a staggering $34 trillion, and these two candidates collectively responsible for a third of that figure, their fiscal policy takes center stage. This article aims to delve deeper into their different approaches to key economic issues.
Tax policies
A nation’s fiscal policy is a key determinant of its economic health. It is through taxes that the government generates revenue, which is then used to finance public services and infrastructure. The two candidates have divergent approaches to taxation, which reflect their broader economic philosophies.
The first candidate, a 78-year-old, is expected to extend the tax cuts adopted in 2017. This approach is rooted in the belief that lower taxes stimulate economic growth by increasing the disposable income of individuals and businesses. However, to balance the budget, this candidate will have to make significant cuts in social spending. This could include programs like Medicaid and food stamps, which support the most vulnerable in society.
Instead, the 81-year-old candidate would likely extend tax cuts to families earning less than $400,000. This approach is designed to provide relief to the middle class while ensuring that the wealthy pay their fair share. To finance these tax cuts, this candidate is proposing significant tax increases for the wealthy. This approach is based on progressive taxation, according to which those with higher incomes pay a larger share of their income in taxes.
Trade policies
Trade policy is another area where the two candidates have divergent views. Both agree on the need to maintain tariffs on Chinese imports, a controversial and debated policy. The 78-year-old candidate has proposed a 60% increase in these tariffs, which could have a significant impact on the US economy.
Both candidates argue that these tariffs will increase U.S. jobs by making imported goods more expensive and thus encouraging domestic production. However, it will be interesting to see how this policy affects inflation. Tariffs can lead to higher prices for consumers, which in turn can raise inflation.
Regulatory policies
Regulation is another key area of economic policy. The 78-year-old candidate will likely pursue a significantly lower regulatory policy. This approach is based on the belief that less regulation leads to greater economic activity and growth.
Under the current administration, the United States is quietly producing more oil and natural gas than ever before. However, the 78-year-old candidate would allow even more accelerated production with lower environmental regulations and easier permitting. This approach could have significant implications for the environment and for the United States’ efforts to combat climate change.
Conclusion
As the 2024 election approaches, it is important for voters to understand the candidates’ economic policies. These policies will have a significant impact on the economy, the environment, and the well-being of the American people. Whether it’s taxes, trade or regulation, each candidate offers a distinct vision for the future of the U.S. economy. It is up to voters to decide whose vision they agree with and which candidate they believe is best equipped to lead the nation in these difficult times.
Frequent questions
Q. What are the major economic issues in the 2024 elections?
The main economic issues in the 2024 elections involve tax, trade and regulatory policies. The candidates’ approach to these issues will have a significant impact on the economy, the environment, and the well-being of the American people.
Q. How do the candidates’ tax policies differ?
The 78-year-old candidate is expected to extend tax cuts enacted in 2017, rooted in the belief that lower taxes spur economic growth. On the other hand, the 81-year-old candidate would likely extend tax cuts to families earning less than $400,000, aiming to provide relief to the middle class while ensuring the wealthy pay their fair share.
Q. What are the candidates’ views on trade policies?
Both candidates agree on the need to maintain tariffs on Chinese imports. However, the 78-year-old candidate has proposed a 60% increase in these tariffs, which could have significant implications for the US economy.
Q. How do candidates’ regulatory policies differ?
The 78-year-old candidate will likely pursue a significantly lower regulation policy, based on the belief that less regulation leads to greater economic activity and growth. This approach could have dramatic consequences for the environment and for the United States’ efforts to combat climate change.
Q. How important is it to understand the candidates’ economic policies?
Understanding the candidates’ economic policies is essential, as these policies will have a significant impact on the economy, the environment, and the well-being of the American people. Each candidate offers a distinct vision for the future of the American economy, and it is up to voters to decide which vision they agree with and which candidate they believe is best equipped to lead the nation.
The post Analysis of the economic policies of the candidates in the 2024 elections appeared for the first time on Due.