Jack Smith denounces Trump’s immunity request as a threat to democracy

In a motion to the Supreme Court, Special Prosecutor Jack Smith argued that the stay should be denied and that Trump’s immunity claim is a threat to democracy.

Smith wrote:
The conduct alleged in the indictment, if proven at trial, represents a concerted effort to violate the tenure clause of the Constitution, see U.S. Constitution. Art. II, § 1, Cl. 1 (the President-elect “remains in office for a period of four years”), and the President’s duty to “take care that
the Laws are faithfully executed”, id., § 3.

The assertion that a former president is immune from federal criminal liability for conduct that could overturn his election defeat contravenes fundamental constitutional principles and threatens democracy itself.

The petitioner never acknowledges the constitutional cost of insulating a former president from criminal liability for such conduct.

For more stories like this, sign up for our The Daily newsletter.

Trump’s argument, if the Supreme Court rules in favor, would mean that any incumbent president who loses an election could decide not to leave without consequences. If a president wanted to rig an election, thanks to Trump’s claim of immunity, he could do so without consequences.

Granting unlimited immunity to a former president would destroy the safety net that protects American democracy.

Trump’s request for immunity poses a danger to the principles on which the nation was founded.

A special message from PoliticusUSA

If you are in a position to donate exclusively to help us keep the doors open on PoliticusUSA during what is a critical election year, please do so here.

We are honored to be able to put your interests first for 14 years as we respond only to our readers and will not compromise on that core, core value of PoliticusUSA.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *