PUFFGATE: Disgusting MSM piece accuses 16-year-old Loretta of wearing the letters “HH” – which stands for Helly Hansen, not Heil Hitler! | The Gateway Expert

“Loving your country is not a crime”: Banner at Loretta’s high school

The attack on 16-year-old German Loretta continues: after her principal reported her to the police for posts on TikTok that included a Smurfs video (reported by Gateway), the usual Trump-hating German mainstream media suspects have banded together against her to paint her as some sort of crypto-Nazi. Their charges include a photo with the letters “HH” – which turned out to be a Helly Hansen jacket.

The former conservative newspaper “Welt” published a vile article about Loretta on Tuesday, accusing her of posting “deeply far-right symbols” and claiming that she had been wearing “a top with the letters HH sewn on” – implying that this is the ‘short for “Heil”. Hitler.” Using the Nazi slogan is a crime in Germany.

The Junge Freiheit newspaper spoke to Loretta and her mother, who said they had never been confronted with the alleged screenshots sent by an anonymous spy to her principal, and that they discovered that the letters “HH” were “stitched” onto her clothes actually referred to the popular fashion logo. Helly Hansen brand!

Helly Hansen is a Norwegian sportswear brand popular among rappers like Xzibit, and has been worn by stars like Kate Middleton, Bradley Cooper and Megan Fox. Logos are usually printed and not sewn.

The newspaper “Die Welt” also claimed that Loretta’s posts included the number “1161”, a numerical code which they said stands for “Anti-Antifa” (A is the first letter and F the sixth letter of the alphabet). The once-conservative newspaper did not explain what is wrong with opposing the violent left-wing shock troops who regularly terrorize right-wing politicians in Germany without consequences. German Interior Minister Nancy Faeser wrote an article for the magazine “Antifa” in 2021.

However, Young freedom he pointed out that Loretta had never heard of this code. Nor do any of the numerous state-run or funded hate speech monitors that keep lists of alleged right-wing codes.

“Die Welt” also accused Loretta of crimes such as publishing a photo of herself in front of a German flag. The newspaper essentially regurgitated the self-acquitting version of the local police, who claimed that the video of the Smurfs posted by Loretta had nothing to do with it. Loretta and her mother insist that the Smurfs video was also mentioned by the police, who tried to threaten her over her social media posts.

The Loretta’s Smurfs meme, which has become a worldwide joke at the expense of the German police and government, reads: “The Smurfs are blue – and Germany is too!” Blue is the color used by the right-wing AfD party, which has become the strongest party in East Germany.

The newspaper “Die Welt” is part of Springer Publishing, owned by Kohlberg Kravis Roberts of the American Henry Kravis, together with Business Insider, which is facing legal action from the American investor Bill Ackman for an equally disgusting article on Ackman’s wife, Neri Oxman. Springer also owns the website Politico and the tabloid “Bild,” Germany’s largest daily newspaper. Matthias Döpfner, CEO of Springer, is a member of the steering committee of the Bilderberg meetings, a contributor to the World Economic Forum in Davos, a former member of the Atlantic Councilof the German chapter Atlantikbrücke and the flagship of the censorship-industrial complex Institute for Strategic Dialogue and guest of the Council on Foreign Relations.

The youth movement Generation Identity climbed onto the roof of the school in Ribnitz-Damgarten on the Baltic Sea in northern Germany and unfurled a banner reading “Loving your country is not a crime”.

“We wanted to express our support for Loretta and her family when she was attacked, so we made the banner over the weekend and went to school on Monday morning,” a spokesperson for the Identitarian Movement Mecklenburg-Vorpommern told the Gateway Pundit. “The school has a fire escape, so it was easy to get onto the roof. We just needed a ladder for the last two meters onto the roof. We wanted to unfurl the banner right before school started on Monday, so many would see it, so there were some teachers who tried to approach us, but we still managed to escape. So far there have been no charges brought by police, the spokesperson said. The Identitarian Movement is a peaceful, non-violent youth movement protesting against mass illegal immigration and has been criminalized in much of Europe despite its non-violent nature inspired by Greenpeace and other left-wing groups.

Young freedom revealed that another family at the Richard-Wossidlo-Gymnasium reported political persecution at the school, where a teacher told a student not to criticize the ruling Green Party.

Speaking to the NIUS website, Loretta’s mother said she confronted the principal about why he hadn’t come to her sooner. She “she told me that she has been ordered by the state Ministry of Education to report any alleged far-right incidents to the Ministry and the police, who are then obliged to verify whether a crime has been committed. “These were the orders of the Ministry of Education of Mecklenburg-Western Pommerania,” the headmaster told Loretta’s mother.

Teachers were also instructed to monitor the type of clothes the children were wearing and to report any brands associated with the far right, Loretta’s mother told the ministry. «You told me that there had also been criminal complaints against the students, as if to say: what are you complaining about? Loretta didn’t do anything.

Loretta said a teacher had assigned her to write a report on the AfD and “how dangerous it is.” Loretta also said that there had been an event at her school sponsored by the ruling Social Democratic Party Friedrich Ebert Foundation on “recognition of far-right hatred”. The German federal government spends 182 million euros per year under the “Living Democracy!” program. program to “fight the far right” in schools and elsewhere.

THE Alternative for Germany (AfD) has scheduled a debate on the case in the German Bundestag on Friday. The regional parliament of Mecklenburg-Western Pommerania will also not comment on the incident on Thursday.

Young freedom publisher Dieter Stein wrote in Chronicles Magazine:

“Under the federal Interior Minister, Nancy Faeser (a Social Democrat), the state intends to criminally prosecute people who express opinions and say things that, while not strictly illegal, are considered “harmful.” The head of the Verfassungsschutz, Thomas Haldenwang , said he wanted to prevent “certain models of speech and thought” from taking hold in public opinion. He did not clarify what he meant by “certain models.” Esteemed professors of law and the Constitution have expressed deep concern about these intentions.

“What Ms. Faeser pursues here is pure ideology and against the constitution,” warned former Defense Minister and state law professor Rupert Scholz in a recent interview with the BILD newspaper. “You delegitimize free speech, the cornerstone of our democratic state.” Law professor Volker Böhme-Neßler of the University of Oldenburg rebuked the minister for his “appalling denial of free speech.” Others have drawn parallels with the freedom-repressing policies of the former GDR.

But the government made up of the SPD, Greens and Liberals has the advantage. In recent months, a relentless wave of propaganda has presented the AfD and other critics of the establishment as a danger to democracy. Indeed, the only thing the party poses a danger to is the hegemony of the left-liberal establishment and their vision of a “rainbow” democracy that caters to the interests of all kinds of minorities and awakens causes. A number of green and left-wing NGOs are being showered with taxpayer money to “work for democracy” in this specific sense. Federal Interior Minister Nancy Faeser is pushing ahead with plans for a so-called Orwellian “Demokratiefördergesetz” (democracy promotion law), which would give an extra 200 million euros a year to predominantly left-wing pressure groups fighting the AfD .

The “Smurfs scandal” at the Mecklenburg-Vorpommern high school might seem like an overblown, one-off outrage, but it is emblematic of hundreds and even thousands of similar incidents in which citizens are intimidated for expressing unruly opinions that the government and the media mainstream doesn’t like it. Civil servants are afraid of losing their jobs or suffering a career setback if they speak out. AfD party activists saw their cars burned or their houses attacked with paint or stones; hotels and other venues are very reluctant to rent locations for AfD meetings and events because, if they do, they often face threats or violent attacks from Antifa groups.

The government claims they are “promoting democracy”. But what kind of democracy does a government have that denounces the second opposition party as an “enemy of democracy”? What kind of democracy allows the mainstream political bloc to organize state-sponsored mass protests against dissidents who deviate from the mainstream, to the point of intimidating citizens and even schoolchildren because of their political views? Is this democracy or is it a semi-totalitarian state?

Attempts to crush an open opposition force through a combination of state propaganda and the disturbing abuse of a national spy organization are reminiscent of the former GDR, not a true democracy of the kind that the citizens of the former GDR had hoped for when they took took to the streets more than 30 years ago to free themselves from the left-wing dictatorship. What we’re seeing now is the emergence of a sort of RPG 2.0. Those who claim to protect democracy are actually undermining it.”



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *